I'd originally carried a P220 when I hired on with the state and thought highly of it. At first I was happy, prefering Sig pistols to the Austrian squirt gun. They had used the HK P7 for years and had recently switched to the Sig. When I transfered to my current assignment I gave up the standard issue Glock 21 and was issued the 226. I had the great misfortune to be saddled with a P226 with a DAK trigger for about five years. Just one session, but I thought it was at first blush an easier trigger to shoot than a LEM, as it was a rolling trigger of continuous weight, as opposed to the light weight take-up before hitting the wall of the LEM. I would love to shoot the Rogers School test with it, as I bet it rocks on transitions, and especially one hand shooting.
No doubt it would be a lousy pistol to try to set PR's on Bill drills, but I found it very easy to get a surprise break with. I purposefully short stroked it to the first reset point a few times, to see the "heavier" trigger, and didn't find it objectionable.
Previously, I spent a number of years shooting revolvers as primary, and the DAK trigger felt very natural to me on this initial session. 357 Sig, and for pure fun to experience the DAK. I can seeing using it in very cold conditions, such as Alaska in the winter where I am wearing some types of gloves continuously when outside, as a launcher for. I am not planning on dedicating myself to the DAK system. Or it can just be a "fun" gun-nothing wrong with that either. But I would suggest that to truly wring it out that you might be best to dedicating yourself primarily to it-and if you're comfortable with that level of commitment, I think you'll be very pleased with the results. I'm not at all implying that it's a bad gun, or that the DAK is a bad action choice. I've had at least two previous P229s (both DA/SA variants), and for whatever reason, they've never seemed to stick with me either.
For what it was, I found the gun to be relatively heavy and bulky (as found when I used it as a carry gun while single-track mountain biking), and the DAK trigger really demanded significant commitment, if not near exclusivity to truly master and take advantage of. However, after having it for several years, I decided to divest myself of it. 40 barrel to be glitch-free), it was reliable and accurate. 357 SIG incarnation, but took some 300-400 rounds with the. Once broken in (as I recall, it was good from the get-go in the. And with the original DAK "light" triggerpull weight. 357 SIG barrels for it-and in the (for me) desirable "classic" receiver (rounded triggerguard, no light rail). I am going to mess around with it, and consider carrying it some this summer, around the four legged creatures. My wife refers to my new pistol as the "85 car." She commented that the trigger felt better than her beloved Glock pistols, although she isn't switching anytime soon. The pistol was used in a federal training program, has an "AM" prefix serial number, and is prominently marked "85," presumably to differentiate it from pistol 84 and 86. Shot 50 rounds of Ranger 125 bonded yesterday, mostly on dots, and just loved the trigger and cartridge. 357 Sig (which I have been considering for penetration on creatures) and the DAK, I figured it would be a fun, relatively inexpensive fun gun. Between the 229R (I have no railed 229 pistols). 357 Sig a while back, at a crazy low price. A PF member, friend and Sig enthusiast sent me a link to a used. I have always liked revolver triggers, and would carry one more if they held more cartridges, were flatter and easier to reload.
0 kommentar(er)
